Law Of Torts - Study Mode
[#421] Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (name of defense) and give the correct answer by using the given below: List I (Decided case) List II (Principle stated) a. Samira Kohli v. Prabha Manchanda 1. Plaintiff a wrong-doer b. Sodan Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Committee 2. Leave and licence c. Bird v. Holbrook 3. Act of God d. Kallulal v. Hemchand 4. Necessity
Correct Answer
(A) a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3
[#422] An action under scienter and negligence can be brought by
Correct Answer
(D) All the above
[#423] The principle of 'Res ipsa loquitur' was followed by the Supreme Court in the case of
Correct Answer
(A) Pushpabai v. Ranjit G & P. Co., AIR 1977 SC 1735
[#424] In case of tortuous liability, an act done under the authority of a statute-
Correct Answer
(D) Is a complete defence for obvious harms as well as incidental harms resulting from the act when it is not done negligently
[#425] X, a mother, along with her daughter, Y was shopping in a departmental store, named. "All the Necessities". Y slipped 5 lipsticks in the bag of her mother. They were apprehended by the security staff of the store and after one hour both were handed over to the police. Y was convicted for theft but X was acquitted. X sued for false imprisonment by the store.
Correct Answer
(B) X would not succeed as there was a lawful justification for her detention, as the stolen goods were found in her bag