Law Of Torts - Study Mode
[#286] Consider the following statements: 1. To bring an action for damages in respect of a public nuisance by a private individual, the injury must be direct and not merely consequential 2. Private nuisance may be with respect to property or personal physical discomfort. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct Answer
(C) Both 1 and 2
[#287] Match the principles mentioned in List I with the associated cases in List II and select the correct answer from the given below: List I List II a. Neighborhood Rule 1. Greenock Corp. v. Caledonian Rly. b. Volenti non fit injuria 2. Donoghue v. Stevenson c. Vis major 3. Achutrao Haribhau Khowda v. State of Maharashtra d. Res ipsa loquitur 4. Smith v. Charles Baker and Sons
Correct Answer
(D) a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3
[#288] Holihood Silver Fox Farm v. Imet is a case which is related with the torts of
Correct Answer
(C) Nuisance
[#289] The doctrine of desuetude refers to 1. Neglect by the courts. 2. State of disuse 3. Contrary practice being adopted Select the correct answer using the given below,
Correct Answer
(C) 2 and 3 only
[#290] Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer by using the below: Assertion (A): The existence of a duty to take care is essential before a person can be held liable in negligence. Reason (R): The standard of care required is not a matter of law and does vary according to the individuals although it does not vary according to the circumstances.
Correct Answer
(C) (A) is right but (R) is wrong