Indian Penal Code - Study Mode
[#2196] Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer: List I (Subject) List II (Case) a. Insanity as defence 1. Emperor v. Birendra Kumar Ghosh b. Group liability based on sharing of common intention and participation in the act therefore 2. McNaghten's case c. Jus Necessitatis 3. State v. K. M. Nanavathi d. Murder on grave and sudden provocation 4. R. v. Dudley and Stephens 5. State of Maharashtra v. M. H. Geroge
Correct Answer
(D) a-2, b-1, c-4, d-3
[#2197] Whoever causes death of a person by rash or negligent act not amounting to murder is liable to be punished with
Correct Answer
(D) With imprisonment extending to two years or fine or both
[#2198] A' handed over his watch to a watchsmith for repairing. In order to not pay the repairing charges 'A' picked up his watch from the shop, when the watchsmith was not looking. In this case
Correct Answer
(C) 'A' is guilty of theft
[#2199] Consider the following statement: Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code does not apply where: 1. Five or more person assembled where one killed A 2. A and B who are enemies of C decided distinctly of kill C. A killed C when B was also present 3. The presence of any person, who participated in the pre-arranged plan, is not necessary at the time of actual commission of the crime 4. Privity of mind of all the accused is an essential ingredient for the commission of crime of these statements:
Correct Answer
(D) 1, 3 and 4 are correct
[#2200] What amounts to grave and sudden provocation in a given case is:
Correct Answer
(B) A question of fact