Indian Penal Code - Practice Test

(A) Piyus Ekka v. State of Orissa, 1991

(B) Shabir Rashid v. State, 1969

(C) Jang Singh v. State of Rajasthan, 1984

(D) Mukesh v. State, 2008

(B) Shabir Rashid v. State, 1969

(A) Section 169 of Indian Penal Code

(B) Section 170 of Indian Penal Code

(C) Section 171 of Indian Penal Code

(D) Section 172 of Indian Penal Code

(A) Section 169 of Indian Penal Code

(A) In theft, there is dishonest intention whereas in extortion it is not there

(B) In extortion there is dishonest intention whereas in theft it is not there

(C) In theft, there is dishonest intention whereas in extortion it is fraudulent intention

(D) In theft, there is taking of property whereas in extortion there is delivery of property

(D) In theft, there is taking of property whereas in extortion there is delivery of property

(A) Involuntary Intoxication ⇔ Section 86

(B) Basudeo v. State of Pepsu ⇔ Section 86

(C) Attempt to Commit Suicide ⇔ Section 306

(D) Bigamy ⇔ Section 497

(B) Basudeo v. State of Pepsu ⇔ Section 86

(A) To compel any person to do what he is legally bound to do

(B) To commit mischief

(C) To commit criminal trespass

(D) To obtain property forcefully

(A) To compel any person to do what he is legally bound to do

Indian Penal Code - Study Mode