Indian Evidence Act - Practice Test

[#391] Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer: List I (Provisions) List II (Sections of Evidence Act) a. Burden of Proof 1. Section 106 b. On whom burden of proof lies 2. Section 103 c. Burden of Proof as to particular fact 3. Section 102 d. Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge 4. Section 101

(A) a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2

(B) a-2, b-3, c-4, d-1

(C) a-4, b-3, c-2, d-1

(D) a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4

Correct Answer

(C) a-4, b-3, c-2, d-1

[#392] Which one of the following is not correctly matched?

(A) Hostile witness ⇔ Section 154

(B) Burden of proof as to ownership ⇔ Section 110

(C) Refreshing memory ⇔ Section 159

(D) Profession communication ⇔ Section 124

(E) Child witness ⇔ Section 118

(F) Dumb witness ⇔ Section 120

(G) Hostile witness ⇔ Section 154

(H) Expert witness ⇔ Section 45

Correct Answer

(D) Profession communication ⇔ Section 124
(F) Dumb witness ⇔ Section 120

[#393] Under Indian Evidence Act a copy compared with a copy of a letter made by a copying machine is

(A) Primary evidence

(B) Oral evidence

(C) Secondary evidence

(D) Any of the above

Correct Answer

(C) Secondary evidence

[#394] Which of the following does not constitute secondary evidence?

(A) A photograph of the original document taken on a smart phone

(B) A copy compared with the original document made by a copying machine

(C) Copy transcribed from a copy, not compared with the original

(D) Oral evidence regarding the contents of a document, by a person who has seen the original document

Correct Answer

(C) Copy transcribed from a copy, not compared with the original

[#395] In which case the Supreme Court held that material evidence and not the number of witnesses has to be taken note to ascertain the truth of the allegations made

(A) Surendra Prasad Tiwari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2005 SC 125

(B) Syed Ibrahim v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 2006 SC 2908

(C) Rajinder v. State of Haryana, AIR 2006 SC 21

(D) Jagdish Murav v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2007 SC 35

Correct Answer

(B) Syed Ibrahim v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 2006 SC 2908

Indian Evidence Act - Study Mode

Correct Answer

[#392] Which one of the following is not correctly matched?

Correct Answer

[#393] Under Indian Evidence Act a copy compared with a copy of a letter made by a copying machine is

Correct Answer

[#394] Which of the following does not constitute secondary evidence?

Correct Answer

[#395] In which case the Supreme Court held that material evidence and not the number of witnesses has to be taken note to ascertain the truth of the allegations made

Correct Answer