Indian Evidence Act - Study Mode
[#1076] A written contract is proved as per Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act. Can the terms thereof be proved to have been altered by a contemporaneous oral agreement by a third party to the written contract?
Correct Answer
(C) The terms of the written contract are only binding between the parties to the document but a third party to the written contract can always show contemporaneous oral agreement to
vary the terms of the written contract
[#1077] Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer: List I List II a. Confession caused by inducement, threat, promise 1. Aghnoo Nagesia v. State b. Confession to a customs officer 2. State of Punjab v. Barkatram c. Confession in the FIR (First information Report) given by the accused 3. Pyarelal Bhargava v. State of Rajasthan d. Discovery of a fact pursuant to a statement in police custody 4. State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad
Correct Answer
(D) a-3, b-2, c-1, d-4
[#1078] "A" the admissions are confessions but all the confessions are not admissions."
Correct Answer
(B) The statement is incorrect
[#1079] Where in a judicial proceeding the handwriting of a teacher is in question, the opinion of his or her student shall be relevant under . . . . . . . . of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
Correct Answer
(B) Section 47
[#1080] Which one of the following Section Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has been inserted by Section 92 and schedule II of the Information Technology Act, 2000?
Correct Answer
(C) Section 67A