Indian Evidence Act - Practice Test

(A) Admissions could be oral only

(B) Admissions could be documentary only

(C) Admissions could be oral or documentary

(D) Admissions are conclusive proof of the matters admitted

(E) Minimum 2 witnesses are required for the proof of any fact

(F) Minimum 3 witnesses are required for the proof of any fact

(G) Minimum 4 witnesses are required for the proof of any fact

(H) No particular number of witnesses is required for proof of any fact

(I) The Indian Evidence Act applies to affidavits

(J) The Indian Evidence Act applies to a proceeding whose object is to determine a jural relation between one person and another

(K) The Indian Evidence Act applies to arbitration proceedings

(L) The Indian Evidence Act applies to departmental proceedings

(M) Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act applies to contracts by infants

(N) Pardanashin ladies are exempt from estoppel

(O) A representation made by an agent is effectual for the purpose of estoppelas if it had been made by his principal

(P) An admission by an advocate even if it is erroneous in law is binding on his client

(Q) Admissions may be oral or documentary or contained in an electronic form

(R) Admissions is by documentary proof only

(S) Admissions are conclusive proof of the matters admitted

(T) Admissions include admission by conduct

(U) Leading questions may be freely asked in examination-in-chief of a witness

(V) Leading questions may be freely asked in cross-examination

(W) Leading questions may be freely asked in re-examination

(X) Leading questions may not be put to a witness of tender years

(Y) Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply to third parties

(Z) Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply to criminal cases

([) Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply if there is not completed contract

(\) Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply to a contract if it cannot be specifically enforced

(]) A dying declaration recorded by a Magistrate not empowered under section 164 Criminal Procedure Code cannot be proved by the oral evidence of the Magistrate

(^) The credit of the declarant cannot be impeached

(_) A dying declaration is substantive evidence

(`) If the declarant is not examined although alive, his declaration is admissible

(a) Confession caused by inducement, threat or promise flowing from person in authority, giving reasonable impression to the accused that he would thereby avoid punishment is relevant

(b) Confession by accused while in custody of police, even if made in the immediate presence of a magistrate, shall not be proved

(c) The confession of the accused made while in custody of police may be proved if as a consequence of information received thereby a relevant fact is discovered

(d) None of these

Indian Evidence Act - Study Mode

[#716] An evidence sought through unfair means is:

Correct Answer

[#717] According to which section of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, The Court may direct any person present in Court to write any words or figures for the purpose of enabling the Court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person.

Correct Answer

[#718] When any fact is especially with in the knowledge of accused, the burden of proving that fact is upon.

Correct Answer

[#719] A fact is said "not to be proved" in Indian Evidence Act

Correct Answer

[#720] Which of the following statements is correct?

Correct Answer