Indian Evidence Act - Practice Test

[#526] The right to cross-examine on an answer to court question is available:

(A) To the adverse party only

(B) To the party calling the witness only

(C) To either of the parties if the answer is adverse to either of the parties

(D) Only A and not B

Correct Answer

(C) To either of the parties if the answer is adverse to either of the parties

[#527] During the course of trial of a rape case, a person present in Court causes a knife injury to another person before the Court. The Judge before whom the incident took place:

(A) May not be called in evidence

(B) May be called in evidence only under special order of a higher Court

(C) May be examined as a witness

(D) May be called in evidence, only if the trial of that incident is going on before a higher Court

Correct Answer

(C) May be examined as a witness

Explanation

Solution: During the course of trial of a rape case, if a person present in Court causes a knife injury to another person before the Court, the Judge before whom the incident took place may be examined as a witness. According to the Indian Evidence Act, any person who is present in court and has witnessed an incident can be examined as a witness to provide testimony regarding the events that occurred. There is no requirement for special orders from a higher court to call the judge as a witness in such a scenario. The judge may be examined like any other witness to provide evidence relevant to the incident.

[#528] In which of the following instances, insulting words can form the basis of an action for defamation?

(A) Written by a husband to his wife

(B) Written by a client to his lawyer

(C) Written in an inland letter

(D) Written in a post card

Correct Answer

(D) Written in a post card

[#529] Under which section of the Evidence Act provisions for presumption as to Gazattes in Electronic forms has been made?

(A) Section 81A

(B) Section 85A

(C) Section 85B

(D) Section 88A

Correct Answer

(A) Section 81A

[#530] Presumption of jurisdiction will be in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant who disputes the fact has the burden of proof to prove the contrary. Is it rue?

(A) Yes

(B) No

(C) A higher court should decide the jurisdiction. The court whose jurisdiction is questioned should not decide whether it has jurisdiction or not

(D) None of the above

Correct Answer

(A) Yes

Indian Evidence Act - Study Mode

[#526] The right to cross-examine on an answer to court question is available:

Correct Answer

[#527] During the course of trial of a rape case, a person present in Court causes a knife injury to another person before the Court. The Judge before whom the incident took place:

Correct Answer

Explanation

[#528] In which of the following instances, insulting words can form the basis of an action for defamation?

Correct Answer

[#529] Under which section of the Evidence Act provisions for presumption as to Gazattes in Electronic forms has been made?

Correct Answer

[#530] Presumption of jurisdiction will be in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant who disputes the fact has the burden of proof to prove the contrary. Is it rue?

Correct Answer