Indian Contract Act - Study Mode
[#356] An agent appointed by more than one principal is liable
Correct Answer
(D) Either A or B or C
[#357] A invites B for his son's wedding. B accepts the invitation. In this case, there is an agreement but no contract, since
Correct Answer
(B) There is no intention to create legal relationship
[#358] If the bailee mixes the goods of the bailor with his own goods, without the consent of the bailor
Correct Answer
(C) Both A and B
Explanation
Solution: According to the Indian Contract Act, if a bailee mixes the goods of the bailor with his own goods without the bailor's consent, the consequences depend on whether the goods can be separated or not. If the goods can be separated or divided, the bailee is responsible for the expense of separation and for any damages arising from the mixture. If the goods cannot be separated, the bailee must compensate the bailor for the loss of the goods. Therefore, both Option A and Option B are correct, making Option C the correct answer. Correct Answer: Option C: Both A and B
[#359] A, writes a letter to B offering to sell his car at Rs. 2 lac and states that if he does not receive a reply within 15 days of the receipt of the letter by B, the offer shall be deemed to have been accepted. B does not send a reply even after 15 days of the receipt of the letter by B. Has the offer been validly accepted?
Correct Answer
(A) No
[#360] Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the given below the lists: List I (Case) List II (Principle) a. Lalman Shukla v. Appana Dutt 1. Privity of Contract b. McPherson v. Appanna 2. General offer c. Banwarilal v. Sukhdarshan Dayal 3. Invitation to treat d. M. C. Chackoo v. State Bank of Travancore 4. Intention to create legal relationship
Correct Answer
(B) a-2, b-3, c-4, d-1