Constitution Of India - Study Mode
[#1181] Consider the following statements with regard to protection in respect of conviction for offences: 1. In the case of Sampath Kumar v. Enforcement Directorate, Madras, it was held that it is unconstitutional to give a caution to speak the truth. 2. No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. 3. No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. 4. Criminal law in India can be enacted retrospectively. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct Answer
(C) 2 and 3
[#1182] In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar, the State made a law under Entry 54, List II and Center made a law under entry 33 of List III. The laws overlap. Will repugnancy arise in such a case?
Correct Answer
(C) Both A and B have to be satisfied
[#1183] The Supreme Court has no original jurisdiction in a dispute between:
Correct Answer
(C) A state-owned public corporation and Government of India not involving fundamental rights
[#1184] Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom:
Correct Answer
(D) To form associations or unions, cooperative societies
[#1185] In the Rajya Sabha, the President can appoint how many representatives
Correct Answer
(D) 12