Indian Penal Code - Study Mode
[#1186] Assertion (A): X. because of unsound state of mind and not knowing the nature of the act, attacks Y, who in self-defence and in order to ward off the attack, hits him thereby injuring him. Y has not committed an offence. Reason (R): Y had a right of private defense against X under Section 98 of the Indian Penal Code:
Correct Answer
(A) Both A and R are individually true, and R is the correct explanation of A
[#1187] It was found that disclosure statement made by the deceased led to the recovery of gold ornaments worn by the deceased, weapons used in crime and blood stained clothes of accused. In which of following cases the conviction was held by the court as proper under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code?
Correct Answer
(B) Geijaganda Somaiah v. State of Karnataka (2007)
[#1188] For an offence of Criminal Conspiracy under Section 120A of Indian Penal Code, the parties involved should agree to do or cause to be done an act:
Correct Answer
(D) A and B
[#1189] A' sent through the post office, a packet containing seditious publications, with a covering letter requesting the addressee to circulate it to others. It was intercepted and never reached the addressee . 'A'
Correct Answer
(D) Is guilty of an attempt to commit sedition
[#1190] The definition of criminal conspiracy in Section 120A, Indian Penal Code has been taken from that given in
Correct Answer
(B) Quinn v. Leatham